Exeter, NH       Friday, January 26, 2001


Search new and used cars.

   News-Letter
    Today's News
    Archives
    Cartoons
    Columnists
    Classifieds
    Crossword
    Editorials
    Lottery
    Photographers
    Reporters
    Weather

   Public Records
    Obituaries
    Police Logs

   Port. Herald
    News
    Business
    Maine News
    Sports
    Spotlight

   Weeklies
    Hampton Union
    Rock. News

   Entertainment
    Concerts
    Datemaker
    Dining
    Exhibits
    Features
    Menu Guide
    Movie Times
    Music
    Nightlife
    Theatre
    TV Times

   Tourism
    Attractions
    History
    Parks/Beaches
    Photo Gallery
    Summer Events

   Local Resources
    Book Travel
    Churches
    Event Calendar
    Homes Plus
    Local Links
    Mortgage
    Shopping
    Shop for a Car
    Towns
    Yellow Pages

   About Us
    Advertising
    Comm. Printing
    Contact Info
    Employment
    Logos/Link
    Mem. Services
    Newspaper Del.
    Photo Reprints
    Place An Ad
    Site Index
    Site Search





Attacks on superintendent are unjustified

By Stephen G. Hermans,
Complete 2001 Editorial Archives
Complete 2000 Editorial Archives

I am the attorney who represented SAU 16 and the other defendants in the Knight case. I send this letter to respond to the unjustified criticism of Superintendent Hanson which has appeared in this newspaper.

The important facts are these:

From May through August 1999 Mr. Knight made various requests to examine the school's Internet history log files.

In August 1999 Superintendent Hanson obtained an opinion from special legal counsel stating the schools would violate federal law (the Electronic Communications Privacy Act) if the schools revealed the Internet history log files to Mr. Knight. Superintendent Hanson then informed Mr. Knight that the schools would not allow him to examine the Internet history log files for that reason.

Approximately three months after Superintendent Hanson so informed Mr. Knight and approximately six months before Mr. Knight filed his lawsuit, the technology personnel at the Exeter Region Cooperative School District (ERCSD), who monitor Internet use, altered the settings on the computer servers so that the Internet history log files would only cover the most recent five weeks of activity. This was done because the volume of Internet history had increased enormously and the servers could only store a limited amount of information.

Mr. Knight filed his suit in June 2000, at about the end of the 1999-2000 school year. When the 2000-2001 school year commenced, the ERCSD technology personnel once again altered the settings on the servers. This time they altered the settings so that all Internet activity from the start of the 2000-2001 school year would be retained. This was done because of Mr. Knight's suit and so that, if he prevailed, the files would not contain only five weeks of activity, but would contain activity dating back to the start of the school year.

When Mr. Knight's case was tried the issue of the period of time covered by the files was not discussed. Neither Mr. Knight's lawyer nor I asked Superintendent Hanson or the other ERCSD witness any questions about the period of time then covered by the Internet history log files. I did not ask any such questions because I did not believe the period of time was relevant to the issue to be decided by the court. The issue to be decided by the court was whether the Internet history of files were "public records" subject to inspection under the state right to know law and the federal law referred to above. Also, I knew that the volume of data in the files was enormous. (As it turned out the volume of data eventually released to Mr. Knight was equal to approximately 147,000 pages and was more than double the volume of data which existed in the Internet history log files as of the date of his initial request.)

After the judge decided that the Internet history log files should be produced, ERCSD prepared and delivered to Mr. Knight a disk containing the information he requested covering the period of time back to the beginning of the 2000-2001 school year. As stated above, this disk contained the equivalent of 147,000 pages of information and was more than double the volume of the files as they existed as of the date of his initial request.

The judge disagreed with me on the relevance of the period of time covered by the files. Her opinion counts, not mine. She also made the incorrect finding that files were destroyed after Mr. Knight filed his suit and because he filed his suit. I regret that I was unable to convince her otherwise.

The attacks on Superintendent Hanson are uninformed and unjustified. His decisions and other actions in this matter were in no way deceitful or dishonest. He is a man of integrity who has been unfairly maligned. As a parent with three children in the Exeter schools, and as a taxpayer, I feel fortunate to have Superintendent Hanson as our Superintendent of Schools.

Stephen G. Hermans is an attorney who lives in Exeter.

Click here for more news

Click here to send this article to a friend

Seacoast Online is owned and operated by Seacoast Newspapers.
Copyright © 2001 Seacoast Online. All rights reserved. Please read our
Copyright Notice and Terms of Use.
Seacoast Newspapers is a subsidiary of
Ottaway Newspapers, Inc., a Dow Jones Company.


The Point and Click
dining guide
for the Seacoast